Wednesday, September 28, 2016

Reading "Uncle Tom's Cabin"

This past week, we have studied two literary critics who take a very different perspective on the problem of sentimentalism in Uncle Tom's Cabin. As we have discussed in class, "sentimentalism" is a rhetorical mode directed at the audience's emotions (or "sentiments") to convince this audience of the truth of the speaker's message. Both writers agree that Harriet Beecher Stowe used a sentimental, or melodramatic, rhetoric to communicate her political beliefs: narratives of suffering, injustice, and violence are intended to motivate her audience to action.

For James Baldwin, however, Stowe's "sentimentality" is symptomatic of her hypocrisy with respect to the political subject of her novel. The goal of a writer: "to find something a little closer to the truth...a devotion to the human being, his freedom and fulfillment, freedom that cannot be legislated, fulfillment that cannot be charted." For Baldwin, Stowe's "self-righteous, virtuous sentimentality... leaves unanswered and unnoticed the only important question: what it was, after all, that moved her people to these deeds." He excoriates her novel for this lack, arguing that ultimately, her sentimentality is nothing more than a mask for her racism, her belief that black souls and black bodies are "fallen" and in urgent need of salvation.

Jane Tompkins, on the other hand, argues this attitude towards Uncle Tom's Cabin is characteristic of a "male-dominated scholarly tradition," as critical "modernists"  have been typically dismissive of the genre of sentimental fiction. Although she does not mention Baldwin in particular, she argues that critics of modernism tend to praise the difficult, the complex, the psychological: none of which are characteristic of melodrama. By taking this attitude, one of the most important and popular traditions of feminine authorship in the American nineteenth century is dismissed out of hand. For Tompkins, then, the charge of sentimentality is itself problematic: she associates it with a sexism characteristic of American intellectual life. She argues that to understand the political potency of Harriet Beecher Stowe and other "melodramatic" writers of her era, it is absolutely necessary to re-evaluate sentimentality within its historical context.

And thus a conflict emerges. Baldwin reads Stowe's sentimentality as masking an implicit racism. Tompkins, in turn, might argue that Baldwin's criticism is itself characteristic of an unquestioned sexism. To complete this assignment: please find a passage from the novel that you feel is emblematic of either Baldwin's or Tompkin's argument, or both. Briefly summarizing the passage, explain to the classroom community how Baldwin or Tompkins might approach this section of the novel.

Although you do not need to, you may wish to place your response in the context of one or more of these GUIDING QUESTIONS:

Can these perspectives be reconciled? Is one critic's claim to understand the meaning of Uncle Tom's Cabin more valid, more true, or more important than the others? Is it possible to believe in the truth of both critical responses? What perspectives on literature, writing, or history might be implicit in these writers claims? Please feel free to answer any or all of these questions, responses are due on Wednesday.

2 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This book provides us the opportunity to look back and review the work at a different place in time. The sentimental value of the book is quite evident. On one hand Baldwin argues that the book is overtly raciest, while at the same time Tompkins essential says that it is a period piece and a valuable work from the female prospective.

    It’s not possible to fully understand where each writer is coming from, because we a lacking prospective, but prospective views might help us figure it out. Baldwin is writing as a black male in the 1950’s, a time when the civil rights movement were at their peak. Baldwin felt that the sentimental fiction was a mask or the writer, He viewed this novel as a racist work. The white washing of the black characters, in order to make that white reader more comfortable. Converting the hellish and uncivilized ways of the black characters to ones with Christian values.

    Tompkins is writing 20+ years later, after the civil rights movement had passed. She is essence is making the point that this is a prospective that is rarely heard from in those times. Stowe is writing from the view of an upper class woman with ownership of the slaves. There is also a feminine softness in the novel. Stowe shows that women have the ability to show compassion and the power to educate the youth.

    I believe that it is important to understand the times around the writing of the novel and also historical context. I can she how both critical have valid points in response to this writing

    ReplyDelete