Monday, November 21, 2016

A room of creativity or a room of confinement?

In A Room of One’s Own, Virginia Woolf introduces us to her idea that "a woman must have money and a room of her own if she is to write fiction." She explains that a woman needs a space of her own to express her creative freedom if she is to write. Additionally, by the end of the book her ‘little idea’ about women needing a space of their own is connected to history, politics, sexuality, and society.
In The Yellow Wallpaper by Charlotte Perkins Stetson, the woman is confined in a room. Rather than seeing a room as imaginative, creative, private, and free as Woolf, Stetson she argues that a room of one’s own is limited and belittling. However, Woolf argues that woman do not have a room of their own because they are oppressed by society – they cannot enter certain libraries, they do not eat the same food as men - and to be truly happy they need money and time as men have. Stetson’s woman is far from being ‘oppressed.’ She is well off financially, she has many people working for her and taking care of her, she is a wealthy person that has everything Woolf says is necessary to thrive but yet she is still completely unhappy and victimized.

So the question is do woman need a private, secure and comfortable place to write from? The ides overlap on one theme. Women are societally and personally oppressed when it comes to writing.

“There comes John, and I must put this away, -he hates to have me write a word” (649).

The woman’s in Stetson book is not ‘supposed’ to write similar to the Woolf’s idea that women have been historically and systematically denied to the right to write comparative to men. However, the reason Stetson’s woman cannot write is because she is experiencing “a slight hysterical tendency” (648) as described by her husband, who is a physician of high standing. Her husband symbolizes science, rationality, reality, and the proper way to do and think of things throughout the book. So the read is left to believe the woman is fortunate to have her own room to heal but the isolation may be exasperating the sickness. Woolf argues that this secure place is essential, and Stetson writes that an isolated room might lead to more issues.

“The front pattern does move -and no wonder! The woman behind shakes it!” (654).

The woman in Stetson’s writing has been isolated in the room with the yellow wallpaper for so long that she becomes obsessed and proprietary of the wallpaper. In the exert above, the woman personifies the wallpaper. In her mind, the wallpaper is alive. This challenges Woolf’s believe that a secure room would lead to creativity and the chance to truly and fully express one’s ideas. However, for Stetson there is no creativity or free flowing expression or even writing. There is only the wallpaper. The wallpaper is the one thing the woman fixates on and becomes obsessed with. Stetson challenges Woolf’s claim that a secure room leads to creativity and happiness. Stetson’s secure and individual room may have led to depression and cultural hysteria.

Woolf and Stetson’s books might agree that historically women are oppressed when it comes to writing. Woolf cannot find literature about women or by women and is not given the same writes as the men; Stetson is unable to write because her husband disapproves. However, they clash in the fact that Woolf believes if you have money, time, and a free space to write that you should be perfectly happy to exercise your creativity and therefore write. The Yellow Wallpaper contradicts this belief and tells the reader that a room of one’s own can lead to a certain type of hysteria.

The question remains pertaining to gender and how gender is actually playing a role in The Yellow Wallpaper. Gender has so much to do with social class, money and power. Is the husband’s diagnosis of sickness for his wife about being sick or is it about being a woman. I believe he truly believes she is sick but by isolating her and treating her, as she is sick is only making the sickness worse. I wonder how he would treat a patient if it were male.


No comments:

Post a Comment